Reviews of Gravity’s Shadow can be found as follows. Please inform me if you know of others.<\/p>\n
This space will accumulate additions, amendments and corrections to the text of Gravity’s Shadow brought to the author’s attention by Scientists.<\/p>\n
Page 438 note 5; July 2004: Massimo Cerdonio assures me that he refused all offers to become a big player in European interferometry, understanding that were he to dilute his efforts, the resonant detectors for which he has a particular passion would be put at risk.<\/p>\n
Mavalvalla incorrectly spelled Malvalvalla beneath her photograph.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(If you find any typos in addition to the ones listed here please let me know in case there should be a second edition)<\/p>\n
p 234 Note 1 is irrelevant. It repeats the note already present in the diagram. Perhaps the box in the diagram could be removed to save renumbering notes.<\/p>\n
p 236 4th sentence: delete `rather than after’<\/p>\n
p 236 three lines up: delete `yet’<\/p>\n
p 238 Paragraph break should come before `I’ll start my richer description<\/p>\n
p536 index lists seismic noise but nothing about seismic noise on p 536<\/p>\n
p 544 footnote 6: `… ). But’ should be `…), but’ [ie, merge two sentences.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Reviews Reviews of Gravity’s Shadow can be found as follows. Please inform me if you know of others. NEW SCIENTIST : 16 October 2004 (by Robert Matthews) NATURE: 17 February 2005 (by Virginia Trimble) TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT: 4 March 2005 (by David Hughes) HISTORY OF PHYSICS NEWSLETTER: IX, 4, \u2026<\/p>\n