Skip to main content

Inclusive Design

Providing learning that is authentic, meaningful and relevant by recognising the needs and perspectives of all learners, and designing for all

Inclusive design of our programmes, modules or teaching sessions is essential to ensure we are providing learning that is authentic, meaningful and relevant, by recognising the needs and perspectives of all learners, and designing for all. On this page you will read about how you can support all learners in Higher Education, using the principles of inclusive, universally designed learning opportunities. It is for anyone who is teaching or supporting students, in any role. 

Inclusive design aligns to the Professional Standards Framework (PSF 2024) overall requirement for ‘effective and inclusive practice’, and in particular to Professional Values V1: Respecting individual learners and groups of learners, and V2: promoting engagement in learning and equity of opportunity. It is central to A1: ‘Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes’. It also enables application of K1: ‘How learners learn’, and K2: ‘Approaches to teaching and/or supporting learning’.  

The Cardiff University Inclusive Education Enhancement Model has a series of key targets for enhancing design which draw on research and sector recommendations. 

Enhancement Model Targets for Design: 

  • Learning and assessment is student-centred and interactive, promoting on-going opportunities for students to make choices about the curriculum, teaching approaches and assessment practices. 
  • There are learning opportunities on all modules and assessments on the programme where students bring their own experiences to learning related to diversity and inclusion issues or local or international communities 
  • Modules have taught sessions that use images, verbal or text scenarios or examples, and case studies that highlight or draw upon diverse characteristics. 

You can develop your understanding of Inclusive Education by engaging with our related workshops, which are available asynchronously, to take in your own time, and can be followed by a live workshop (with enough demand), or a bespoke meeting with the lead to discuss application to your practice. Find out more on the Cardiff LTA CPD page. 

Designing for all of our diverse students is central to Cardiff University’s Strategy, ‘Our Future, Together’.  

Key Principles of inclusive, universal design for learning 

Learners differ markedly in what sparks their motivation and enthusiasm for learning, and how they are able to engage with learning. ​Learners must also be able to bring their authentic selves to the learning environment and find connections to what matters most in their lives.​ Learners also differ in the ways they perceive and make meaning of information. We must consider how people access information, and how people, cultures, individual and collective identities and perspectives are represented within the content (CAST 2023).​ 

When planning a teaching session or series of teaching sessions, plan to use a range of teaching strategies: there is no one approach that is inclusive for all learners, as every activity will advantage some, and disadvantage others. We tend to employ ‘folk pedagogy’ where we teach how we have been taught, and which have benefitted us as learners. 

For example, a common activity in sessions is small group discussions with feedback to the larger group, which enables social, constructivist learning, and builds team working skills. However, some learners might struggle to interact in this process, due to neurodivergence, anxiety or cultural experiences of learning, if they have previously studied in different, more didactic settings. Some might therefore benefit from some time completing individual, silent reflection activities, or use of digital feedback mechanisms, such as mentimeter or padlet. Some may require clear explanations of expectations for active learning. 

Multiple means of Engagement : Stimulate motivation and sustained enthusiasm for learning by promoting various ways of engaging with material. Multiple means of Representation: Present information and content in a variety of ways to support understanding by students with different learning styles/abilities. Multiple means of Action/Expression: Offer options for students to demonstrate their learning in various ways (e.g allow choices of assessment type).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moriarty (2016) suggests that the principles of UDL prompt institutions to embed anticipatory adjustments in the design of curricula that are flexible, adaptable to multiple forms of engagement and therefore facilitate all student learning. These anticipatory adjustments, by their very nature, apply to ALL students: ‘What is essential for some students is beneficial for all’. 

When planning your session, or series of sessions, plan for multiple means of engagement, representation and action and expression: you can do this within the same activity, for example, by welcoming feedback on the activity in text or oral form, or across a series of activities, by having one group work, one individual task and one digital response activity within a session. You can also ensure asynchronous engagement for those who cannot attend. In this way the variety of needs of your diverse learners can be met. 

Duration/Time  Teaching
strategy and content 
Student
Activity 
10 mins  Introduction: Teacher talk  Listen and take notes (didactic teaching of core content, slides, readings and notes available in advance and afterwards) 
20 mins  Group activity: Apply talk to practice  Group discussion with feedback via oral presentation or mentimeter (social learning with choice of feedback mode, available asynchronously) 
10 minutes  Introduce individual activity: Silent reflection and 1 minute summary  Listen to or read introduction to task, reflect and write 1 minute summary (choice of modes for instructions for activity) 
10 minutes  Conclusion: Mentimeter Quiz and summary  Complete quiz online (multi-media for range of activities, can be completed asynchronously) 

For further reading: Bale and Seabrook (2021) consider a range of inclusive teaching strategies in their book ‘An introduction to university teaching’, including small and large group teaching, lab work, fieldwork and digital education. 

The Student Perspective on UDL

‘While I don't think that it was implemented equally across different modules/degree programmes, I feel that many of my lecturers made an effort to implement the Universal Design for Learning principles in their teaching. For the most part, curricula and its delivery were flexible and adaptable to the specific needs of the students in the room. Also, while some lecturers did so more than others, there was guidance around assessment criteria, which included some overview of key terminology that is used in relation to assessments’

Cardiff University student, 2025

Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy 

The students in our classrooms arrive with a diverse set of learning needs and a range of cultural experiences and identities. Learning must be looked at within the context and the culture in which they occur. Culture has been defined in many ways, for example, ‘shared patterns of behaviours and interactions, cognitive constructs, and affective understanding that are learned through a process of socialization. These shared patterns identify the members of a culture group while also distinguishing those of another group’ (Hanesworth et al. 2019: 1) 

Multiple levels of awareness are necessary for teachers to be culturally responsive. This includes knowledge of personal biases, students’ backgrounds/strengths, how the learning environment should build from students’ strengths; and how to bring about change in education systems. 

Teaching using UDL is further enhanced when acknowledging how race, cultural, and linguistic differences could affect students’ learning (Kieran and Anderson 2019). The Universal Design for Learning guidelines (CAST 2024), version 3.0, incorporate culturally sustaining pedagogies. 

Students Top Tips:

1. State Learning Objectives at the beginning of the lecture or seminar so students know what the lecture or session is about.

2. Give a summary of the seminar reading or questions you want the students to consider. It makes it explicit as to what we are expected to do and helps us focus on what is needed.

3. Be open and flexible in your teaching approach. No matter how much preparation you do in advance of teaching a session, you never know what the specific needs of the students will be in that particular session. Anticipate that change may be necessary and facilitate that change where necessary.

4. Practices such as providing lecture slides at least 48 hours in advance can make a significant difference, especially for international students and those with additional learning needs.

5. Aligning assessment methods with learning outcomes and teaching activities. This kind of clarity is essential when assessment criteria are well explained and clearly linked to what we’re actually learning, it feels much fairer and easier to focus on what’s expected.

Cardiff University Students, 2025.

Reflect on the student experience of learning and teaching

Go to the detailed UDL guidelines by reading them on the CAST website and identify aspects of your teaching or organisation of teaching that you would re-design to ensure you are employing universal design for learning, for each of the three areas of engagement, representation, and action and expression.

 You may wish to click on each bullet point for ideas which might resonate for your teaching.

Where next? 

Link to other toolkit pages 

Our three key areas of focus of Fostering a Sense of Belonging, Empowering Students to Fulfil their Potential, and Developing Inclusive Mindsets are in the Inclusivity themes section of this toolkit. 

Additional resources and references. 

CAST 2024. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Online. Available at:  http://udlguidelines.cast.org    

Hanesworth, P. Seán Bracken & Sam Elkington (2019) A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy, Teaching in Higher Education, 24:1, 98-114 

Hockings, C. 2010. Inclusive Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: A Synthesis of Research. York: Higher Education Academy. 

Kieran, L. and Anderson, C. 2018. Connecting Universal Design for Learning With Culturally Responsive Teaching. Education and Urban Society 2019, Vol. 51(9) 1202–1216 

Moriarty, A. and Scarffe, P. 2019. Universal Design for Learning and Strategic Leadership. In: Bracken, S. and Novak, K. Transforming Higher Education through Universal Design for Learning: An international perspective. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge